Table of Contents
CMI 703 Assignment Questions
Guideline word count
The written word, however generated and recorded, is still expected to form the majority of assessable work produced by Learners at Level 7. The amount and volume of work for this unit should be broadly comparable to a word count of 3500 – 4000 words within a margin of +/-10%. The excessive use of word count is not grounds for referral, however the CMI reserve the right to return work to the Centre for editing and resubmission by the Learner.
The following are excluded from inclusion in word count, if used and not required by the assessment brief an introduction to a job role, organisation or department, index or contents pages, headings and sub headings, diagrams, charts and graphs, reference list or bibliography, reflective statement drawn from undertaking the assessment and how this has impacted on the learner’s work.
CMI 703 Answers
TASK 1 – ‘The role of collaboration and partnerships in strategic contexts
AC 1.1 Critically assess the scope and value of collaboration and partnerships to support the achievement of strategic objectives
Scope of Collaboration and Partnerships to Support the Achievement of Strategic Objectives at Unilever
Collaboration and partnerships are a crucial part in backing the achievement of strategic objectives at Unilever, which is a multinational company for consumer products. The corporate responsibility and sustainability objectives of Unilever, along with its business model, make these connections especially essential (Bustinza et al., 2019). First, the company has set sustainability objectives that are ambitious, like sustainable Living Initiative and the devotion to ensure that all its plastic packaging can be recycled reused, or compostable before 2025 (Zahoor, et al., 2020). The resource-based view theory indicates that the competitive advantage of an organization is derived from its exceptional capabilities and resources (Moallemi et al., 2020). Therefore, the sustainability initiatives and goals of Unilever are a representation oof essential resources that can be leveraged through collaboration and partnerships. For example, Unilever has partnered with the World Wildlife Fund to foster sustainable sourcing of palm oil. The collaboration strengthens the resource base of the company for sustainable raw material procurement (Supply Management, 2021). Moreover, the extensive supply chain of Unilever involves several partners. Collaboration is essential to making sure there is sustainable and responsible distribution, manufacturing, and sourcing (Gazley and Guo, 2020). Partnerships in the supply chain management area aid them to minimize the social and environmental effect of their supply chain, going in hand with their objectives of strategic sustainability. The transaction cost economics perspective aims at minimizing costs of transaction by choosing the best structure of governance (Supply Management, 2021). The extensive supply chain of Unilever entails main transactions. Therefore, collaborating with distributors and suppliers enables the company to economize on costs of transaction by minimizing the requirement for hierarchical control. For example, the partnership of Unilever with local suppliers in emerging industries like Africa and India (Freeman et al., 2021). These collaborations and partnership minimize the costs of transaction by taking advantage of local networks and expertise for sourcing and distribution.
Nevertheless, whereas the scope of partnerships and collaborations at Unilever is essential, there are also some potential drawbacks and challenges to consider. Precisely, depending highly on partnerships and collaborations can bring about dependency on external companies (Zahoor, et al., 2020). If a partner changes or fails its strategy, the company may experience challenges or disruptions in accomplishing its strategic objectives. Also, managing several partnerships and collaborations across different geographies and functions can be resource-intensive and multifaceted. Efficient coordination is important to make sure it aligns with the objectives of the company.
Value of Collaboration and Partnerships to Support the Achievement of Strategic Objectives at Unilever
The value of collaboration and partnerships to back the accomplishment of strategic goals at Unilever is important. The business model of the company and its goals of sustainability highly depend on a series of collaborative affiliations (Brown et al., 2021). First, collaboration and partnerships are valuable for Unilever because they help the company achieve its goals of sustainability. This connection is valuable because it helps the company minimize its ecological standing, foster sustainable sourcing, and enhance the well-being of populations (Freeman et al., 2021). This idea is also backed by the resource-based view theory because the partnership between Unilever and NGOs, governments, and environmental institutions help the company exploit the resources and expertise of the partners to promote initiatives of sustainability (Bustinza et al., 2019). For example, the partnership and collaboration with the Rainforest Alliance helps Unilever to source certified agricultural products that are sustainable (Dahlmann and Roehrich, 2019). However, there can be challenges associated with this since the reputation of the company is closely related to undertakings and practices of the partners. It means that controversies and negative actions involving the collaborating and partner companies can affect the reputation and brand of the company (Organimi, n.d). Also, the partners can sometimes prioritize other objectives other than those of Unilever, and hence negatively affecting the success of the company in the implementation of its strategic objectives.
AC 1.2 Critically evaluate the impact of organisational and legal frameworks on collaboration and partnerships
The Impact of Organizational Frameworks on Collaboration and Partnerships at Unilever
The matrix organizational structure of Unilever promotes effective cross-functional cooperation, which has a favorable effect on collaboration. For instance, cooperation between several departments, including supply chain, R&D, and marketing, is essential to Unilever’s Sustainable Living Plan. The integration and coordination of activities can be done with ease because to the matrix structure. Consequently, Unilever can effectively accomplish its business objectives, minimize its environmental footprint, and optimize its sustainability programs (Organimi, n.d). Additionally, Unilever actively seeks out external alliances, especially with startups and research institutions, in order to drive innovation. This is made possible by its open innovation platform. For example, to promote product innovation, Unilever Foundry, their innovation platform, works with startups all around the world (Freeman et al., 2021). This strategy makes sure Unilever can quickly adjust to changing market demands and stays at the forefront of consumer products innovation. Collaborating across functional areas can be facilitated by assembling expertise through cross-functional teams (Stott, 2022). These groups make it easier to integrate different viewpoints and approaches to problem-solving. Unilever’s cross-functional product sustainability teams serve as one illustration. Supply chain, packaging, and marketing specialists can collaborate with Unilever to develop eco-friendly products and packaging that meet consumer demands and promote sustainability goals.
Though, there are also some adverse effects. Although it fosters collaboration, the matrix organizational structure can also be difficult and lead to conflict. Power disputes or competing priorities may exist amongst various divisions and departments (Brouwer et al. 2019). This can make it more difficult to manage partnerships, slow down decision-making, and impede productive collaboration. Disagreements between the R&D and marketing divisions, for instance, could impede the creation and introduction of sustainable products. Furthermore, Unilever’s open innovation strategy may be risky even though it promotes outside collaborations. If Unilever relies too much on outside partners, it could become reliant on their dedication and performance (Young, 2023). Unilever may encounter difficulties accomplishing its objectives if a significant partner underperforms or modifies its strategic course. Unilever’s need on startups to generate novel product concepts is a prime example of this dependence.
The Impact of Legal Frameworks on Collaboration and Partnerships at Unilever
There are several positive impacts of legal frameworks on collaboration and partnerships at Unilever (Organimi, n.d). At Unilever, legal frameworks are important in forming partnerships and collaborations since they provide the company and its partners with a number of advantages. By outlining the responsibilities and rights of each collaborator, these frameworks offer legal protection. When proprietary technologies, intellectual property, and sensitive data are shared, this protection is more important (Supply Management, 2021). Unilever guarantees that its valuable expertise and sensitive data are protected by establishing ownership and protection of intellectual property rights in a clear and concise manner. For instance, legal agreements outline the ownership and protection of intellectual property rights when Unilever works with a research institute to create novel goods. This guarantees Unilever’s sovereignty over its exclusive expertise. Another way that legal agreements reduce risk is through their use (Kolker and Carroll-Scott, 2020). They define responsibility in the event of conflicts or contract violations and provide an overview of dispute resolution procedures. Legal frameworks’ accountability and clarity help control risk by giving Unilever and its partners peace of mind that any disagreements will be resolved in accordance with pre-arranged parameters. To lower the danger of poor products causing supply chain disruptions, Unilever, for example, may include in its contracts with suppliers’ rules defining quality requirements and consequences for noncompliance (Kolker and Carroll-Scott, 2020).
Legal frameworks provide many benefits, but in the context of Unilever’s partnerships and collaborations, they also have some difficulties and disadvantages. The inherent intricacy of legal agreements is a prominent drawback. The establishment and management of these frameworks can be complex and time-consuming (Eweje et al., 2021). For example, negotiating and establishing legal agreements with international partners can be a drawn-out procedure, which may slow down Unilever’s ability to introduce new goods or enter new markets (Stahl et al., 2021). Legal professionals may also need to be involved due to the complicated nature of legal frameworks, which would increase overall complexity and possibly postpone the formation of partnerships.
AC 1.3 Appraise strategies and principles for making collaboration and partnerships a success
Strategies for making collaboration and partnerships a success at Unilever
A diverse strategy is necessary to guarantee effective partnerships and collaborations at Unilever. Setting definite, well-aligned goals is the first and most important step. Every partnership should have clearly defined objectives that complement Unilever’s overarching strategic goals and place a strong emphasis on corporate responsibility, innovation, and sustainability (Iglesias et al., 2023). As an illustration, consider Unilever’s Sustainable Living Plan, which establishes exact sustainability goals for its supply chain, products, and operations and aligns all partnerships with them. Strict partner selection comes next, with a focus on how crucial it is to match goals and beliefs with other like-minded businesses, especially when it comes to sustainability and ethical business practices. For example, Unilever works with the Rainforest Alliance, a collaboration motivated by common commitments to environmental conservation and responsible sourcing (Sarbazvatan, 2022). This guarantees a solid match between goals and values. Collaboration is also dependent on effective communication, which calls for an environment of openness and transparency as well as frequent meetings and information exchange. Unilever, for instance, often hosts sustainability conferences with its suppliers, providing a platform for open communication and strategy discussion that encourages cooperation (Sarbazvatan, 2022).
Tailored contracts are also essential to enable collaborations. These agreements must to be equitable, precisely outlined, and intended to safeguard each party’s interests while promoting the accomplishment of common goals (Eweje et al., 2021). As an illustration, consider Unilever’s partnership with a research center to create cutting-edge goods. In this partnership, ownership and protection of intellectual property rights are outlined in formal agreements, guaranteeing Unilever’s control over its exclusive information (Laursen and Andersen, 2023). Moreover, establishing clearly defined key performance indicators (KPIs) is essential for success measurement Frequent evaluations and assessments using these KPIs make it possible to pinpoint areas in need of development and guarantee that they are in line with strategic goals. This approach is demonstrated by Unilever’s usage of KPIs pertaining to sustainability, such as decreases in greenhouse gas emissions or enhancements in the standard of living for smallholder farmers.
Principles for making collaboration and partnerships a success at Unilever
Unilever prioritizes stressing the value of common sustainability objectives in its partnerships. This principle emphasizes how important it is for all parties to support Unilever’s consistent dedication to sustainability (Eweje et al., 2021). These common sustainability goals, which range from lessening the impact on the environment to enhancing livelihoods and responsible sourcing, provide a solid basis for cooperation. This principle is supported by the resource-based theory as it backs allocation of resources to sustain an organization’s competitive edge (Nisa et al., 2021). Unilever’s partnership with the Rainforest Alliance, which encourages tea procurement sustainably and is in perfect harmony with their shared goal of improving the environmental and social sustainability of tea production, is a prime example of this idea in action (Stanley et al., 2022). Another principle of Unilever’s cooperation approach is openness and transparency. Unilever promotes open communication, information sharing, and teamwork in overcoming obstacles with its partners (Stanley et al., 2022). This idea encourages cooperation and trust, which makes for fruitful and successful collaborations. As an example, Unilever keeps open lines of contact with its suppliers by hosting regular sustainability forums where ideas and tactics are freely exchanged to foster greater cooperation.
Unilever’s steadfast dedication to moral and responsible business conduct makes it a fundamental tenet of its partnerships. In accordance with Unilever’s beliefs about respecting human rights, ethical labor practices, and environmental responsibilities, partnerships must abide by certain ethical criteria. As an illustration, consider Unilever’s collaboration with Amnesty International, which shows the company’s dedication to moral corporate conduct and to tackling human rights concerns in its supply chain (Ghobadi and Sonenshein, 2023). The dedication of Unilever to moral and responsible business conduct is consistent with institutional theory. The corporation responds to cultural norms and expectations and aligns itself with institutional constraints by upholding ideals related to fair labor standards and human rights (Stanley et al., 2022).
TASK 2
A.C 2.1 Rationale for Collaboration to Further Organizational Success
Identification of the Opportunity or Need for Collaboration
Addressing Global Sustainability Challenges
The commitment of Unilever to addressing dealing with challenges of global sustainability is profoundly rooted in the corporate identity and core values oof the company. Under the guidance of the institutional theory, as it tends to emphasize the effect of external institutional forces on companies, Unilever acknowledges the growing environmental and societal concerns that surround sustainability (Bista, 2019). As bodies, including, the public, non-governmental organizations, and governments, place intensified significance on sustainable and responsible practices of business, Unilever happens to have incorporated collaboration as a strategic reaction. Realizing that no one group can adequately address the enormous sustainability concerns facing the world is one of the main forces behind this collaborative approach (Baragiola and Mauri, 2022). Global concerns including social injustice, resource depletion, deforestation, and climate change necessitate coordinated action as well as the pooling of resources and knowledge. This insight is consistent with the resource-based view (RBV) ideology, which emphasizes the value of using outside resources and expertise to obtain a competitive edge (Ponte, 2019). When it comes to sustainability, collaboration opens up new possibilities for Unilever to improve its sustainability programs and gain a competitive advantage in the market by utilizing outside knowledge, cutting-edge technologies, and creative solutions. For example, Unilever can collaborate with The Rainforest Alliance in addressing global sustainability issues. Working together, Unilever and the Rainforest Alliance seek to advance sustainable procurement methods, especially in the tea industry (Baragiola and Mauri, 2022). In order to solve problems like deforestation and environmental degradation linked to the production of tea, this collaboration is essential.
Fostering Innovation
Open innovation ideas are a strong fit with Unilever’s business culture, which is devoted to encouraging innovation. Unilever has effectively incorporated the open innovation method into its innovation plans, which signifies a paradigm change from conventional, closed innovation procedures. In order to promote innovation from outside the company, this open innovation framework calls for partnerships with other organizations like startups and research centers (Baragiola and Mauri, 2022). This strategy is consistent with a number of theoretical ideas and strongly matches with Unilever’s innovation mission. The tenets of open innovation theories underscore the idea that innovative concepts, expertise, and technology are not bound to one particular entity (Dmitrievna, 2021). Instead, they can be found elsewhere, and companies like Unilever can improve their capacity for innovation by utilizing this outside knowledge. Open innovation at Unilever is an example of the company’s “outside-in” strategy, which involves aggressively seeking out outside ideas, information, and technologies to support internal innovation initiatives (Dmitrievna, 2021). This strategy is based on the idea that external cooperation may greatly boost innovation, which is not only a result of internal research and development. For example, through the Unilever Foundry platform, Unilever engages with startups as a technique of its open innovation strategy. Startups are renowned for their quick thinking, agility, and capacity for rapid innovation (Geradts and Jansen, 2022). Unilever has access to a vibrant network of innovative concepts and cutting-edge technology through its partnerships with startups. Innovative solutions from startups can enhance Unilever’s business and product development plans.
Evidence to Support the Rationale for Collaboration
Sustainability Impact Data
Unilever’s dedication to sustainability and ethical business practices is demonstrated by its Sustainable Living Plan. The company is guided by a set of sustainability goals and targets outlined in this ambitious strategy. Numerous goals are covered under the strategy, such as enhancing livelihoods, lowering environmental impact, and using responsible sourcing, among others (Day, 2020). In addition to being lofty, these objectives are firmly anchored in Unilever’s basic principles and its vision for a just and sustainable future. The Sustainable Impact Data obtained from Unilever’s Sustainable Living Plan provides strong supporting evidence for the benefits of teamwork (Baragiola and Mauri, 2022). This information provides verifiable evidence of the beneficial effect that partnerships can have on promoting sustainability goals. The Sustainability Impact Data is an effective tool for informing stakeholders, such as customers, investors, and the general public, about the larger impact of Unilever’s sustainability initiatives in addition to evaluating the performance of particular partnerships (Dhamayanti and Restuningdiah, 2022). It offers an open and measurable description of the beneficial adjustments that partnerships can affect in areas that are essential to the business’s goal (Baragiola and Mauri, 2022). Furthermore, this information is not merely retrospective; it also helps with the decision-making process for upcoming projects. Unilever may pick partners and create collaboration strategies that support its sustainability objectives by using the knowledge gathered from successful relationships. For example, Unilever’s partnership with the Rainforest Alliance for tea sourcing has significantly improved the sustainability of tea production, lowered its environmental impact and helped the communities that grow tea (Wilshaw, 2021). The Sustainability Impact Data of Unilever, which is derived from its Sustainable Living Plan and partnerships with groups such as the Rainforest Alliance, provides strong proof of the beneficial effects that cooperation may have in furthering sustainability goals. It illustrates the real advantages of ethical corporate conduct and the possibility of bringing about significant change through partnerships, not just within Unilever but also in the communities and ecosystems that are touched by its operations (Day, 2020). This information not only supports the benefits of cooperation but also reaffirms Unilever’s dedication to sustainability and ethical business conduct.
Open Innovation Success Stories
Unilever has changed the game for the better by embracing open innovation, especially through platforms like Unilever Foundry. Working together with startups and tech companies yields a number of advantages, such as ground-breaking innovations, enhanced customer experiences, and increased operational effectiveness. These external collaborations’ observable results provide strong proof of the strategy’s effectiveness (Wilshaw, 2021). Unilever’s partnerships with creative entrepreneurs in the field of sustainable packaging materials are a clear example of the company’s success with open innovation. Unilever has pioneered eco-friendly packaging solutions by utilizing the creativity and experience of these outside partners (Day, 2020). These solutions help Unilever stay true to its commitment to sustainability by significantly reducing the environmental effect of its products. This achievement demonstrates both Unilever’s dedication to ethical corporate citizenship and the rising consumer demand for environmentally friendly products (Chandra and Jatmika, 2022). Unilever’s embrace of open innovation via Unilever Foundry is evidence of the company’s readiness to defy expectations, consider novel ideas, and remain at the forefront of technological breakthroughs. By using outside talent and fostering a collaborative culture, Unilever is promoting positive change in the consumer products sector while also benefiting from innovative partnerships and sustainable practices. For instance, collaborating with innovative entrepreneurs has resulted in the creation of sustainable packaging materials, reducing the environmental effect of Unilever’s products (Chandra and Jatmika, 2022).
Market Expansion Data
The strong alliances Unilever has with regional distributors across several nations are highlighted by the priceless insights obtained from market expansion statistics. This information acts as a dynamic compass, helping Unilever navigate its entry into new markets and customizing its product lineup to suit regional consumer tastes (Jose, 2021). These partnerships are not just mutually beneficial; they are also a vital means by which Unilever may prosper in a variety of international environments, which will eventually increase its market share. By examining market expansion statistics, Unilever is able to obtain a thorough grasp of the unique requirements, cultural quirks, and purchasing patterns in every new area. Equipped with this understanding, the organization may optimize its range of products, guaranteeing that it appeals to the regional customer base. Unilever’s achievement in entering these sectors and building a strong presence has been largely attributed to its ability to adjust (Miles and Ringham, 2020). The more extensive awareness of Unilever’s brands in a variety of regions serves as hard proof that the partnership was successful. Along with making it easier to enter the market, these partnerships have promoted brand expansion and loyalty. Utilizing information on market expansion, Unilever exhibits its dedication to valuing regional diversity and solidifying its standing as a major player in the consumer products industry globally.
Supply Chain Risk Mitigation
In the area of supply chain risk mitigation, Unilever’s strategic partnerships are essential, and the results are clearly visible in the long-lasting quality and moral standards maintained throughout the company’s extensive supply chain network. By means of these cooperative contracts with suppliers, Unilever is able to guarantee dependable sources as well as accountable and sustainable practices at each stage of the supply chain (Al‐Tabbaa et al., 2022). These preventative actions greatly lessen the risks connected to interruptions in the supply chain and issues with quality. Working together with suppliers who support Unilever’s commitment to moral and sustainable business practices builds a responsive and robust supply chain that can handle unforeseen difficulties. Long-term relationships are cultivated by this dedication to cooperation and common principles, which eventually benefits all parties. Since it demonstrates Unilever’s dedication to ensuring that its products are not just of the highest standard but also made in an environmentally and socially conscientious manner, it is consistent with the company’s bigger sustainability aims (Mehdikhani and Valmohammadi, 2019). For instance, Unilever collaborates with suppliers to guarantee that strict quality requirements are fulfilled and that moral and environmental regulations are observed. This partnership results in a robust and sustainable supply chain.
Success Indicators
Unilever uses an extensive array of success metrics to evaluate the efficacy of its cooperative endeavors. These measurements offer a comprehensive picture of how collaborations support the overall goals and long-term development of the business.
Sustainability Impact
This indicator, which is a key performance metric for Unilever, is correlated with the accomplishment of sustainability objectives set forth in the Sustainable Living Plan (Singh et al., 2019). Metrics that demonstrate the company’s dedication to sustainable and ethical practices include less carbon emissions, less waste, and more effective use of water, in addition to improved lives for smallholder farmers and ethical sourcing methods.
Innovation Output
The quantity of novel technology, goods, or procedures that emerge from joint ventures is a key measure of Unilever’s innovation-promoting effectiveness (Taques et al., 2021). This measure highlights the observable results of collaborating with outside organizations to promote creative solutions and satisfy changing customer needs.
Market Expansion
Unilever assesses the effect of its partnerships on market expansion by looking at the increase in revenue, market share, and outreach to consumers in new areas (Fuertes et al., 2020). An increase in these metrics indicates the effective implementation of tactics intended to penetrate and prosper in a variety of geographic markets.
Supply Chain Resilience
A hallmark of successful supply chain partnerships is the lack of supply chain interruptions and a persistent dedication to moral and sustainable business practices (Kamble and Gunasekaran, 2020). These metrics highlight Unilever’s capacity to establish a resilient and adaptable supply chain that is risk-averse and consistent with its core principles.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Unilever has a solid case for partnership that is backed up by a number of variables. In order to address global sustainability concerns, promote innovation, reach a wider market, and reduce supply chain risks, collaboration is essential. Unilever’s supply chain resiliency, open innovation accomplishments, market expansion, and sustainability impact statistics are all examples of its success. By continuously upholding these values and making the most of cooperative alliances, Unilever can increase organizational success and make a beneficial impact on the environment and society. For Unilever, collaboration is a strategic imperative that is consistent with its basic principles and sets the company up for a sustainable and innovative future. It is not just a choice.
References
Al‐Tabbaa, O., Ciulli, F. and Kolk, A., (2022) ‘Nonprofit entrepreneurial orientation in the context of cross‐sector collaboration’, British Journal of Management, 33(2), pp.1024-1053. Available At: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-8551.12492
Baragiola, G. and Mauri, M., (2022) SDGs and the private sector: Unilever and P&G case studies. Available at: https://www.politesi.polimi.it/handle/10589/195916
Bista, S., (2019) Sustainability in Business (A critique of environmental sustainability practices in Coca-Cola and Unilever). Available at: https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/263797/Sustainability%20in%20Business%20upload%20version%20.pdf?sequence=2
Brouwer, H. et al. (2019) ‘2 multi-stakeholder partnerships’, The MSP Guide: How to Design and Facilitate Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships, pp. 10–21. Available at: https://edepot.wur.nl/543151
Brown, P. et al. (2021) ‘A process model for collaboration in circular oriented innovation’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, p.125499. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620355451
Bryson, J. and George, B., (2020) ‘Strategic management in public administration’, In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1396
Bustinza, O.F. et al. (2019) ‘Product–service innovation and performance: the role of collaborative partnerships and R&D intensity’, R&d Management, 49(1), pp.33-45. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/radm.12269
Chandra, R. and Jatmika, S., (2022) ‘Unilever Surabaya Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) Policy in Maintaining Environmental Sustainability in Surabaya in 2014-2020’, In International Conference on Public Organization (ICONPO 2021) (pp. 444-452). Atlantis Press. Available at: https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/iconpo-21/125970904
Dahlmann, F. and Roehrich, J.K., (2019) ‘Sustainable supply chain management and partner engagement to manage climate change information’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(8), pp.1632-1647. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bse.2392
Day, M., (2020) Exploring methodologies for assessing the outcome of soil management practices in Unilever’s Sustainable Agriculture Code (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University). Available at: https://scholar.sun.ac.za/items/da3b15f9-adbe-4278-ad4d-cc0a79f45a0e
Dhamayanti, Y. and Restuningdiah, N., (2022) ‘Content Analysis: Sustainability Report At Pt Unilever Indonesia Tbk’, International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 2(1). Available at: https://www.ijhess.com/index.php/ijhess/article/view/236
Dmitrievna, K.K., (2021) Transformation of Business Sustainability Strategies of FMCG Companies in the 21st Century on the Examples of Unilever and L’Oréal. Available at: https://dspace.spbu.ru/bitstream/11701/32242/1/MT_Ksenia_Koreneva_GSOM.pdf
Eweje, G. et al. (2021) ‘Multi-stakeholder partnerships: A catalyst to achieve sustainable development goals’, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(2), pp.186-212. Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MIP-04-2020-0135/full/html
Freeman, R.E., Dmytriyev, S.D. and Phillips, R.A., (2021) ‘Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm’, Journal of Management, 47(7), pp.1757-1770. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0149206321993576
Fuertes, G. et al. (2020) ‘Conceptual framework for the strategic management: a literature review—descriptive’, Journal of Engineering, 2020, pp.1-21. Available at: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/je/2020/6253013/
Gazley, B. and Guo, C., (2020) ‘What do we know about nonprofit collaboration? A systematic review of the literature’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(2), pp.211-232. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/nml.21433
Geradts, T. and Jansen, J., (2022) ‘Paradoxical tensions in business sustainability: how corporations develop sustainable ventures’, Handbook on the Business of Sustainability: The Organization, Implementation, and Practice of Sustainable Growth, p.152. Available at: https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=l0lgEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA152&dq=addressing+global+sustainabiliity+at+Unilever&ots=oMxsabaD_h&sig=JaBDCTrsJUuGy-sUhICDmYdNtfw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=addressing%20global%20sustainabiliity%20at%20Unilever&f=false
Ghobadi, S. and Sonenshein, S., (2023) ‘Creating Collaboration: How Social Movement Organizations Shape Digital Activism to Promote Broader Social Change’, Journal of the Association of Information Systems. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shahla-Ghobadi/publication/373139348_Creating_Collaboration_How_Social_Movement_Organizations_Shape_Digital_Activism_to_Promote_Broader_Social_Change/links/64de27521351f5785b7077e1/Creating-Collaboration-How-Social-Movement-Organizations-Shape-Digital-Activism-to-Promote-Broader-Social-Change.pdf
Iglesias, O. et al. (2023) ‘How to build a conscientious corporate brand together with business partners: A case study of Unilever’, Industrial Marketing Management, 109, pp.1-13. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850122002966
Jose, J., (2021) Analyzing the necessity and impacts of organizational culture on the performance of Unilever UK Ltd (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin, National College of Ireland). Available at: https://norma.ncirl.ie/5431/1/jerinjose.pdf
Kamble, S.S. and Gunasekaran, A., (2020) ‘Big data-driven supply chain performance measurement system: a review and framework for implementation’, International journal of production research, 58(1), pp.65-86. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00207543.2019.1630770
Kolker, J. and Carroll-Scott, A. (2020) ‘Partnerships and collaboration’, Urban Public Health, pp. 251–262. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190885304.003.0012
Laursen, L.N. and Andersen, P.H., (2023) ‘Resource and supplier interaction in network innovation governance: The case of innovating at Unilever’, Journal of Business Research, 156, p.113465. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322009304
Mehdikhani, R. and Valmohammadi, C., (2019) ‘Strategic collaboration and sustainable supply chain management: The mediating role of internal and external knowledge sharing’, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(5), pp.778-806. Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEIM-07-2018-0166/full/html
Miles, S. and Ringham, K., (2020) ‘The boundary of sustainability reporting: evidence from the FTSE100’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(2), pp.357-390. Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2018-3478/full/html
Moallemi, E.A. et al. (2020) ‘Achieving the sustainable development goals requires transdisciplinary innovation at the local scale’, One Earth, 3(3), pp.300-313. Available at: https://www.cell.com/one-earth/pdf/S2590-3322(20)30415-2.pdf
Nisa, D.K. et al. (2021) ‘Unilever’s contribution to achieving sustainable development goals 3 in Indonesia’, In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 316, p. 01023). EDP Sciences. Available at: https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2021/92/e3sconf_iconard2021_01023/e3sconf_iconard2021_01023.html
Organimi (n.d.) Unilever’s organizational structure [Interactive Chart], Organimi. Available at: https://www.organimi.com/organizational-structures/unilever/#:~:text=This%20type%20of%20structure%20is,key%20brand%20and%20product%20areas
Ponte, S., (2019) ‘Sustainability, global value chains and green capital accumulation’, Handbook on global value chains, p.228. available at: https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GIC4DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA228&dq=addressing+global+sustainabiliity+at+Unilever&ots=vyfcaNUxY6&sig=nzI5QOhUnZKeh6MtkY0vmiM47sw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=addressing%20global%20sustainabiliity%20at%20Unilever&f=false
Sarbazvatan, S., (2022) ‘From the fair-trade concept to a symbiotic sustainability business model: the case of Unilever and the Lipton-Rainforest Alliance partnership’, International Journal of Competitiveness, 2(3), pp.189-211. Available at: https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJC.2022.127404
Singh, C.S., Soni, G. and Badhotiya, G.K., (2019) ‘Performance indicators for supply chain resilience: review and conceptual framework’, Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 15, pp.105-117. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40092-019-00322-2
Stahl, G.K. et al. (2020) ‘Enhancing the role of human resource management in corporate sustainability and social responsibility: A multi-stakeholder, multidimensional approach to HRM’, Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), p.100708. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053482218303796
Stanley, A.O. et al. (2022) ‘Sustainable Production Strategy and Product Availability: A Study of Unilever Nigeria PLC’, Lafia Journal Of Economics and Management Sciences, 7, pp.44-65. Available at: https://lajems.com/index.php/lajems/article/view/201
Steiss, A.W. (2019) Strategic management for public and nonprofit organizations. Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781482275865/strategic-management-public-nonprofit-organizations-jack-rabin-alan-steiss
Stott, L. (2022) Partnership and transformation: The promise of multi-stakeholder collaboration in context. Available at: https://books.google.co.ke/books?hl=en&lr=&id=DbyXEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT8&dq=Organisational+structures+enabling+multi-stakeholder+partnerships+for+sustainability+How+does+the+organisational+structure+enable+Unilever+to+successfully+manage+multi-stakeholder+partnerships%3F&ots=4YwdYW3OWW&sig=cUUELJWD0PCM8IlVpzN5kLofk3s&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Supply Management (2021) How Unilever balances agility and responsible sourcing, Supply Management. Available at: https://www.cips.org/supply-management/news/2021/june/how-unilever-balances-agility-and-responsible-sourcing/
Taques, F.H. et al. (2021) ‘Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation’, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), pp.11-26. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X19300605
Wilshaw, R., (2021) How Oxfam Has Worked with Unilever to Enhance its Social Impact. Available at: https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/handle/10546/621120
Young, J. (2023) Unilever’s organizational structure characteristics (an analysis), Panmore Institute. Available at: https://panmore.com/unilever-organizational-structure-product-innovation
Zahoor, N. et al. (2020) ‘Collaboration and internationalization of SMEs: Insights and recommendations from a systematic review’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(4), pp.427-456. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ijmr.12238